tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7099013253406999323.post5666799699601110367..comments2023-05-09T00:03:39.102-04:00Comments on horothesia: URLs for PleiadesAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10480131160743773420noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7099013253406999323.post-33016122610002238252007-10-16T15:53:00.000-04:002007-10-16T15:53:00.000-04:00We've added redirects from naked bibliography urls...We've added redirects from naked bibliography urls like <A HREF="http://www.unc.edu/awmc/pleiades/bibliography/aasor" REL="nofollow">bibliography/aasor</A> to the canonical forms like <A HREF="http://www.unc.edu/awmc/pleiades/bibliography/aasor.html" REL="nofollow">bibliography/aasor.html</A>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10480131160743773420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7099013253406999323.post-26508014584446256352007-10-02T20:34:00.000-04:002007-10-02T20:34:00.000-04:00Quick queries...1. For places, is it significant t...Quick queries...<BR/><BR/>1. For places, is it significant that there are sometimes trailing slashes, somtimes not. If yes, why would an individual site have a terminal slash but a group, which is somewhat akin to a folder, not?<BR/><BR/>I tried adding and removing the trailing slash, both worked. Do you want to decide or better not to care.<BR/><BR/>2. Why ".html" at the end of bibliographic records but not on other unique identifiers?<BR/><BR/>3. Are their plans for the right side of unique identifiers. The answer seems to be yes? As in ".html" or ".xml" . Or perhaps, http://pleiades.stoa.org/places/archaic[latitude > 43.00] ? Or is this document('http://pleiades.stoa.org/places/archaic.xml')/place[latitude > 43.00] ?Sebastian Heathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00323339285494849021noreply@blogger.com